Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Beck, JeffreyFunk, Kathryn
Harrison, Melissa
McEntyre, Jo
Breen, Josie
Collings, Andy
Donohoe, Paul
Evans, Michael
Flintoft, Louisa
Hamelers, Audrey
Hurst, Phil
Lemberger, Thomas
Lin, Jennifer
O'Connor, Niamh
Parkin, Michael
Parker, Sam
Rodgers, Peter
Skipper, Magdalena
Stoner, Michael
PubMed ID
30416719
Metadata
Show full item recordURI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056322635&origin=inward; http://hdl.handle.net/2384/582851Abstract
Publishing peer review materials alongside research articles promises to make the peer review process more transparent as well as making it easier to recognise these contributions and give credit to peer reviewers. Traditionally, the peer review reports, editors letters and author responses are only shared between the small number of people in those roles prior to publication, but there is a growing interest in making some or all of these materials available. A small number of journals have been publishing peer review materials for some time, others have begun this practice more recently, and significantly more are now considering how they might begin. This article outlines the outcomes from a recent workshop among journals with experience in publishing peer review materials, in which the specific operation of these workflows, and the challenges, were discussed. Here, we provide a draft as to how to represent these materials in the JATS and Crossref data models to facilitate the coordination and discoverability of peer review materials, and seek feedback on these initial recommendations.DOI
10.12688/f1000research.16460.1ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.12688/f1000research.16460.1
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Related articles
- Coached Peer Review: Developing the Next Generation of Authors.
- Authors: Sidalak D, Purdy E, Luckett-Gatopoulos S, Murray H, Thoma B, Chan TM
- Issue date: 2017 Feb
- A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review.
- Authors: Laband DN, Piette MJ
- Issue date: 1994 Jul 13
- Eyes wide open: reader and author responsibility in understanding the limits of peer review.
- Authors: Benson PJ
- Issue date: 2015 Oct
- Ethical issues in biomedical publications.
- Authors: Kempers RD
- Issue date: 2001
- Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals.
- Authors: Igi R
- Issue date: 2015 Sep-Oct