Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSindberg, Birthe
dc.contributor.authorAagren Nielsen, Christel Gry
dc.contributor.authorPoulsen, Marianne Hestbjerg
dc.contributor.authorBøhme Rasmussen, Martin
dc.contributor.authorCarstensen, Steen
dc.contributor.authorThim, Troels
dc.contributor.authorJakobsen, Lars
dc.contributor.authorSørensen, Jacob Thorsted
dc.contributor.authorHaastrup, Benedicte
dc.contributor.authorSøndergaard, Hanne Maare
dc.contributor.authorMæng, Michael
dc.contributor.authorTerkelsen, Christian Juhl
dc.creatorSindberg, B.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-19T12:00:26Z
dc.date.available2019-09-19T12:00:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifier.issn08964327
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2019/7348167
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064415984&origin=inward
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2384/582906
dc.description.abstractBackground. The transradial approach is generally associated with few complications. However, periprocedural pain is still a common issue, potentially related to sheath insertion and/or arterial spasm, and may result in conversion to femoral access. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) following the procedure is also a potential risk. We evaluate whether the design of the sheath has any impact on these variables. Methods. A total of 1,000 patients scheduled for radial CAG or PCI were randomized (1:1) to the use of a Slender or a Standard sheath during the procedure. Randomization was stratified according to chosen sheath size (5, 6, 7 French) and gender. A radial band was used to obtain hemostasis after the procedure, employing a rapid deflation technique. A reverse Barbeau test was performed to evaluate radial artery patency after removal of the radial band, and level of pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Results. Use of the Slender sheath was associated with less pain during sheath insertion (median NRS 1 versus 2, p=0.02), whereas no difference was observed in pain during the procedure, radial procedural success rates, use of analgesics and sedatives during the procedure, and radial artery patency following the procedure. Rate of RAO was 1.5% with no difference between groups. Conclusion. The use of the hydrophilic coated Slender sheath during radial CAG or PCI was associated with less pain during sheath insertion, whereas no difference in other endpoints was observed. A rapid deflation technique was associated with RAO of only 1.5%.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTerumoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Interventional Cardiology
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleRandomized Comparison of Terumo® Coated Slender™ versus Terumo® Noncoated Traditional Sheath during Radial Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Interventionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eid
dc.identifier.scopusidSCOPUS_ID:85064415984
dc.relation.volume2019
refterms.dateFOA2019-09-19T12:00:27Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
7348167.pdf
Size:
1.559Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Full Text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International